WANG Zhipeng,ZHANG Xiaogang,LI Yuanzhen.Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniation: a Meta-analysis[J].Chinese Journal of Spine and Spinal Cord,2020,(1):53-61.
Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniation: a Meta-analysis
Received:October 23, 2019  Revised:December 30, 2019
English Keywords:Recurrent lumbar disc herniation  Percutaneous endoscopy  Discectomy  Complications  Meta-analysis
Fund:甘肃省中医药管理局支撑项目(编号:GZK-2017-17);甘肃省科技厅重点研发计划(编号:18YF1FA043)
Author NameAffiliation
WANG Zhipeng Department of Orthopedics, Affiliated Hospital of Gansu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 730000, Lanzhou, China 
ZHANG Xiaogang 甘肃中医药大学附属医院骨科 730000 兰州市 
LI Yuanzhen 甘肃中医药大学附属医院骨科 730000 兰州市 
曹林忠  
蒋宜伟  
张宏伟  
赵希云  
陈 钵  
Hits: 3220
Download times: 2540
English Abstract:
  【Abstract】 Objectives: To evaluate the safety and complication rate of percutaneous endoscopic discectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniation through Meta-analysis. Methods: PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CBM, WanFang Data and CNKI databases were searched by computer to collect clinical studies on complications related to percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniation. The retrieval time was from the establishment of the database to August 2019. The Meta-analysis was performed by Revman 5.3 software after two researchers independently selected literature, extracted data and evaluated the bias risk of the study. Results: A total of 1252 patients were enrolled in 13 clinical studies, including 1 randomized controlled trial and 12 cohort studies. Meta-analysis showed that the overall complications[OR=0.46, 95%CI(0.25, 0.87), P=0.02] and dural tear rate[OR=0.16, 95%CI(0.05, 0.56), P=0.004] of PELD were lower than those of traditional fenestration nucleus pulposus removal(P<0.05), but compared with MED and MIS-TLIF, there were no significant differences in the overall complications, dural tear, nerve root injury and incomplete nucleus pulposus removal rate(P>0.05). Conclusions: PELD has a lower incidence of complications and a higher safety than traditional fenestration nucleus pulposus remova in the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation. PELD is a safe and effective method to treat recurrent lumbar disc herniation without imaging instability.
View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close