ZHANG Jianguo,ZHANG Yanbin,WANG Shengru.Influence of pedicle screw instrumentation on growth potential of the immature vertebra[J].Chinese Journal of Spine and Spinal Cord,2018,(12):1060-1066.
Influence of pedicle screw instrumentation on growth potential of the immature vertebra
Received:September 16, 2018  Revised:November 08, 2018
English Keywords:Pedicle screw  Neurocentral synchondrosis  Vertebral body  Spinal canal  Growth
Fund:
Author NameAffiliation
ZHANG Jianguo Orthopaedic Department of Peking Union Medical College Hospital(East), Beijing, 100034, China 
ZHANG Yanbin 北京积水潭医院骨科 100035 北京市 
WANG Shengru 中国医学科学院北京协和医院骨科 100032 北京市 
杨 阳  
林莞峰  
杜 悠  
Hits: 4492
Download times: 2377
English Abstract:
  【Abstract】 Objectives: To explore the influence of pedicle screw instrumentation on the growth of immature spine at a very young age. Methods: Between January 2000 and December 2016, individuals who had bilateral pedicle screw instrumentation were reviewed. Patients younger than 5 years old with a minimal follow-up of 5 years were included. Anteroposterior diameter of vertebral body, pedicle length of both sides, anteroposterior diameter, transverse diameter and area of spinal canal were measured on CT images before surgery and at final follow-up. Parameters of instrumented vertebrae and adjacent non-instrumented vertebrae were compared. Growth value was calculated as: preoperative value - postoperative value, and growth percentage were calculated as: growth value divided by the final follow-up value. Subgroups of thoracic vertebrae and lumbar vertebrae were compared, respectively. Statistical analyses were performed. Results: 13 patients with congenital spinal deformity were enrolled. The average age at surgery was 3.4±1.1(range, 2-5) years old, and the average follow-up was 7.2±2.2(range, 5-11) years. Osteotomy and short instrumentation with pedicle screws were performed on each case. A total of 69 segments was measured, including 43 instrumented vertebrae and 26 adjacent non-instrumented vertebrae. Significant increases of all parameters were noted at final follow-up. The growth value(2.2±1.7mm vs 1.1±1.3mm), the area of spinal canal(72.8±48.5mm2 vs 39.2±26.3mm2), the growth percentage of anteroposterior diameter[(11.2±7.1)% vs (6.0±6.0)%] and area of the spinal canal[(21.3±11.6)% vs (13.4±8.1)%], the anteroposterior diameter of vertebral body(3.8±2.5mm vs 6.1±3.0mm) and its growth percentage[(20.5±12.1)% vs (28.1±11.0)%] had significant differences between instrumented vertebrae and non-instrumented vertebrae(P<0.05). Similar results were noted in lumbar region. Shape-change phenomenon was found in non-instrumented vertebrae and not apparent in instrumented vertebrae. Conclusions: Pedicle screw instrumentation may slow down the growth of vertebral body, indirectly speed up the growth of spinal canal and hinder the shape-change phenomenon of lumbar spinal canal. But the influence is quite slight and the significant development occurs in instrumented vertebrae. So pedicle screw instrumentation may not make a great difference on the growth of immature vertebrae in children younger than 5 years old.
View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close